Photogrammetry vs 3D scanning for creating a 3D model

A 3D model created using photogrammetry (left) vs. a 3D model created using 3D scanning (right).

For starters, let’s touch upon how 3D scanning works, and we’ll also profile the main types of 3D scanners available on the market. This will be of help later, when we move on to comparing this technology with photogrammetry.

3D scanning is a technology that brings physical objects, or to be more precise, information about their shape and oftentimes color, into the digital world. Once you have a digital replica of an object on your computer, a myriad of possibilities open up to you: it can be inspected, measured, modified, put through simulations or stress tests, shared, collaborated on, imported into AR/VR environments – you name it.

Submillimeter-precise capture of aircraft parts with the Artec Leo 3D scanner.

How do you obtain a precise digital replica of an object? The short answer is: with a 3D scanner. The landscape of 3D scanning tools has been rapidly changing over the past few decades as traditional, tried-and-tested technologies evolve and new ones are developed from the ground up. As of now, the most widely used 3D scanning tools are structured-light and laser triangulation scanners.

Structured-light and laser triangulation 3D scanners

The mechanics of these devices are very similar: the scanner projects light onto the surface of an object, and the scanner’s camera records how the beam of projected light is distorted as it is reflected from the surface. The difference here is that structured-light scanners send out beams of white or blue light that form a grid, and laser triangulation scanners emit simple lines.

During scanning, the 3D scanner gathers information about millions of points of the object’s surface, and the scanner’s software analyzes the aforementioned distortions and positions all the points relative to each other, thus reconstructing the shape of the object in the digital environment.

With both structured-light and laser triangulation methods, the 3D point dataset is called a point cloud, and this can be converted into a 3D mesh model. Depending on the program used to make this mesh, its topology can be made up of triangular or quadratic faces, but either way, models consist of millions of these joined together. Conversion is performed to facilitate further work with the digital replica of the object for reverse engineering, CAD, AR/VR, and more.

Professional 3D scanners and software give you the power to reconstruct just about any real-world object in digital form with astounding levels of accuracy.

Structured-light and laser 3D scanning technologies prove particularly effective when you need to scan a relatively small object: from a few millimeters to a few meters in size. With handheld 3D scanners, this process is ultra-fast, and the final 3D model will be highly precise and exceptionally faithful to the original.

Time-of-flight 3D scanning technology

When the size of the object (either its height or length) exceeds several dozen meters, you might want to opt for a 3D scanner that’s based on time-of-flight (TOF) technology, also called pulse-based laser 3D scanning technology. Such scanners can be described as long-range: unlike structured-light and laser triangulation scanners, the distance between a TOF scanner and the object can range between several meters to several hundred or even thousand meters.

How does this technology work? The scanner emits laser pulses. As they are reflected back from a surface, they are picked up by the scanner’s receiver, and the scanner calculates the time (fractions of a second) each pulse took to return. Collecting and recording information about the millions of pulses bounced back, the scanner forms a picture of a surface. The accuracy varies depending on the solution used and the area to be digitized. If you’re scanning a building with a stationary, tripod-mounted 3D scanner, expect it to deliver scans accurate down to just a couple of millimeters; if you need to map a large area of terrain and you’re scanning it from an airplane or UAV, your tolerances may reach several centimeters.

Pros & cons of 3D scanners

As you can conclude from the first part of this article, structured-light, laser triangulation, and TOF scanners can all deliver precise digital replicas of relatively small objects or large surface areas. The accuracy of the spatial data provided by quality 3D scanning solutions makes them indispensable tools in fields where an accuracy error can lead to irreversible consequences or even a disaster. 3D scanners are relied upon in industrial design and engineering, where high-profile specialists use them for a wide range of purposes, for instance, to develop electronics, ensure the stable operation of pipework, and inspect the quality of mass-produced mechanical parts.

In healthcare, applications of 3D scanners vary from designing customized prosthetic devices and implants that fit perfectly and last for years to assessing the results of plastic surgery, both pre-op and post-op. In the arts, entertainment, science, and museums, 3D scanners help create digital doubles of actors, digitize million-year-old fossils at excavation sites and museum repositories, and advance research in spheres such as anatomy, paleontology, and even space exploration. Last but not least, more and more forensic anthropologists are turning to 3D scanning as the fastest and most accurate way to document crime scenes.

Artec Eva is widely used to create high-performance custom prosthetic devices.

In addition to these versatile applications, 3D scanners are distinct for their ease of use. Handheld scanners, for instance, are lightweight devices that you can walk around an object with, capturing every part of the surface. The most advanced of these 3D scanners are all-in-one solutions: they have an inbuilt touchscreen so you can track scanning progress in real time on the scanner’s display, without the need for a laptop or tablet. Having no laptop or tablet also means you can move around the object freely, unhampered by cables or wires.

The real-time feedback provided by these screens is also invaluable for users, as it helps them quickly and easily understand if they’ve captured every area of an object. We’ll delve further into the pros and cons of photogrammetry soon, but it’s worth noting that this is a distinct advantage of 3D scanning with a built-in screen – you instantly know what data you’ve accumulated and what you’re missing.

Additionally, as mentioned early on, 3D scanners capture the object’s shape, and some of them can also capture its color, or texture, as it is known in the world of 3D scanning. While accuracy is 3D scanning’s undeniable trump card, these results can be further enhanced with the vividness photogrammetry can provide.

In quite a few cases, you might want your 3D model to be both as accurate as possible and rendered in true-to-life colors. That’s where you can consider combining 3D scans with photos.

This exact approach was used to create the first-ever 3D portrait of a head of state, then President Barack Obama. For that project, a structured-light scanner (Artec Eva) was used in synergy with photogrammetry. As we now know, photogrammetry is tricky to use when you need to make a 3D model of a person, especially when we’re talking about a president, who’s always on a tight schedule. The workaround here was taking simultaneous shots with as many as 80 cameras mounted on a special scaffolding around the president. This way, all the colors, shades, and hues were picked up in the shortest time possible, and Artec Eva ensured that the shape of the head was captured with utmost accuracy.

Barack Obama being scanned with Artec Evas for the first-ever 3D portrait of a head of state, with a photogrammetry set-up seen in the background. Image source: whitehouse.gov

In another case, combined datasets were used to 3D model an entire car. For this project, the tetherless Artec Leo captured the geometry of the car (both the car’s body and its interior design). Accurate information about the geometry would suffice for industrial designers and engineers. However, in industries such as video game development, vivid colors often play a greater role than the accuracy of the car’s aerodynamic profile, so a game developer might want to superimpose color camera shots on the 3D mesh model. This way, when integrated into a video game, the car will look entirely lifelike, which will make for a far better user experience.

On the software side of things, it’s also worth noting that Artec Studio now makes it easier than ever before to combine 3D scanning and photogrammetry. Alongside scan data capture and processing features, the program packs a photo registration algorithm that allows users to apply textures from high-resolution photos to models. In many cases, this helps improve color clarity and makes scans appear more realistic.

One such case has seen Artec Studio’s joint 3D scanning-photogrammetry functionality deployed to digitize a chair featuring intricate jungle-inspired patterning. Photos were combined with Artec Leo scan data to create texture files, which in turn, were mapped to a 3D mesh using the program’s texturing algorithm. Alongside this crisp, vibrantly colored chair model, the feature has also been used to wrap 140 high-res images of a Nike sneaker around high-resolution 3D scan data, captured with Artec Space Spider.

The stunning Nike sneaker in full-color 3D.

The result of the process, which took just over half an hour to complete, was an incredibly lifelike scan of the Nike Kyrie 7 basketball shoe. This model of the famous footwear featured a highly textured replication of Nike’s 360-degree traction insole, which was scanned by placing the sneaker upside down to avoid creasing. In a similar project, sports brand ASICS has used photo-texturing to create ultra-realistic footwear models for quality inspection and innovative animated marketing content. Each of these initiatives demonstrates the lofty level of detail that can be captured when Artec hardware and software are combined.